Thursday, March 7, 2013

Samsung Galaxy Note 8 First impressions


First impressions

Samsung Note tablets feel quite at home in Barcelona. Last year the company tried to steal the spotlight with the Galaxy Note 10.1 and it's now the smaller version's turn to try its hand.
The Galaxy Note 8.0 sits comfortably between the large Galaxy Note 10.1 and the more pocket-friendly Galaxy Note II. It seems to get the best from both worlds - an earpiece and a microphone from the Note II and the slightly higher resolution and more comfortable S Pen from the Galaxy Note 10.1.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 is also a stylish slate, although we have to admit we are starting to get bored with the design. The good news is the tablet is light, reasonably easy to handle and packs a display, which may not be the best we've seen, is more than reasonable for its class. The Mali-400MP4 GPU is certainly capable of handling higher resolution though, and it's a pity Samsung didn't take that chance to gain an even bigger advantage over its competitors.
Undoubtedly, the array of software features is a key selling point, but save for the special reading mode, they have all been around for quite some time, so they won't make many Samsung users consider an upgrade.
Some will probably find Samsung's latest tablet interesting, but we're not convinced many people will favor it over the Galaxy Note II. Yes, the Galaxy Note 8.0 has more than twice the screen surface, but that's just about all it puts to the table. There's no resolution upgrade to maintain the pixel density and pocketability is certainly worse than it is on the 5.5" phablet.
On the other hand, those that need the S Pen functionality and find the larger screens more productive will certainly prefer the Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1. Unless the pricing (which Samsung stubbornly refuses to disclose) is a nice surprise, the Galaxy Note 8.0 might find it hard to carve a niche for itself.
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 N8000 Samsung Galaxy Note II N7100
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 N8000 • Samsung Galaxy Note II N7100
So, Samsung will have to try and deliver the Galaxy Note 8.0 to the market at a price point close to that of the Apple iPad Mini. While the compact iOS slate has a headstart, the Galaxy Note 8.0 won't be doomed in this battle as it offers a more feature-rich platform, and the extra benefit of the S-Pen.
With its all plastic build, the Galaxy Note 8.0 doesn't hold a candle to the aluminum-clad iPad Mini, but it offers a display of higher pixel density and a more usable screen aspect.
Apple iPad mini Wi-Fi + Cellular
Apple iPad mini Wi-Fi + Cellular
We'll know more about the Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 over the coming months as the tablet gets ready to hit markets around the globe. The compact Nature UX tablet certainly has otential, but it's still in for a tough ride and if Samsung are to make it a success, they have to play their marketing and pricing cards right.

Samsung Galaxy Note 8 Bechmark by Gsmarena


The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 is powered by the company's own 2012-launched Exynos 4 Quad chipset with four Cortex A9 CPUs inside it. As such, it's not at all the last word in mobile processors, but still we've given it the heavy task of going through our array of benchmarks.

Benchmark Pi

Lower is better
  • Asus Padfone 2262
  • Sony Xperia Z264
  • Oppo Find 5267
  • Sony Xperia T269
  • HTC One X+280
  • LG Optimus G285
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0303
  • Samsung Galaxy Note II305
  • HTC One X (Tegra 3)330
  • LG Optimus 4X HD350
  • Samsung Galaxy S III359
  • Meizu MX 4-core362
  • Nexus 4431
The Exynos 4 Quad gets out of breath in Linpack as well and is bluntly outrun by the Snapdragon S4 Pro chipsets and the Cortex-A15s inside them.

Linpack

Higher is better
  • Asus Padfone 2623
  • Sony Xperia Z630
  • LG Optimus G608
  • Oppo Find 5593
  • Samsung Galaxy Note II214.3
  • Nexus 4213.5
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0199.6
  • Meizu MX 4-core189.1
  • HTC One X+177.7
  • Samsung Galaxy S III175.5
  • HTC One X160.9
  • LG Optimus 4X HD141.5
In the compound benchmarks AnTuTu and Quadrant the Galaxy Note 8.0 ranks suprisingly high beating the similarly spec'd Note II.

AnTuTu

Higher is better
  • Asus Padfone 221922
  • Sony Xperia Z20794
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 8.017438
  • Oppo Find 515167
  • Nexus 415146
  • Samsung Galaxy Note II13562
  • HTC One X+13519
  • Samsung Galaxy S III12288
  • Meizu MX 4-core11820
  • HTC One X (Tegra 3)11633
  • LG Optimus G11226

Quadrant

Higher is better
  • Asus Padfone 27846
  • Sony Xperia Z8075
  • HTC One X+7632
  • LG Optimus G7439
  • Oppo Find 57111
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 8.06613
  • HTC One X5952
  • Samsung Galaxy Note II5916
  • Samsung Galaxy S III5450
  • Meizu MX 4-core5170
  • LG Optimus 4X HD4814
  • Nexus 44567

SunSpider

Lower is better
  • Samsung Ativ S891
  • Apple iPhone 5915
  • Nokia Lumia 920910
  • Samsung Galaxy Note II972
  • HTC One X+1001
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 8.01027
  • Motorola RAZR i XT8901059
  • Asus Padfone 21107
  • Samsung Galaxy S III1192
  • Meizu MX 4-core1312
  • LG Optimus G1353
  • Sony Xperia Z1906
  • Nexus 41971
  • Oppo Find 52045

BrowserMark 2

Higher is better
  • LG Optimus G2555
  • Sony Xperia Z1865
  • Oppo Find 51797
  • Nexus 41794
  • Nokia Lumia 9201774
  • Nokia Lumia 8201760
  • Samsung Omnia W1632
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 8.01610
  • Samsung Galaxy S III1247
  • Asus Padfone 21215

Vellamo

Higher is better
  • Samsung Galaxy Note II2418
  • Sony Xperia Z2189
  • HTC One X (Tegra 3)2078
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 8.01822
  • Asus Padfone 21717
  • Oppo Find 51658
  • Samsung Galaxy S III1641
  • LG Optimus 4X HD1568
  • LG Optimus G1522
  • Meizu MX 4-core1468
  • Nexus 41310
The overall results from our benchmark extravaganza with the Galaxy Note 8.0 should come as no surprise to anyone. After all, the device is sporting last year's tech inside it, and can't measure to its more powerful rivals. Despite all of this, the chipset is by no means a slouge and can pull a lot of software weight behind it without breaking too much sweat.

source: http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_mwc_2013-review-895p4.php